Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Provost

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 22:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Provost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a actor. Fails WP:ACTOR. No significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Subject's role in "Insatiable" seems to qualify but not his roles in Realityhigh and Chance do not merit as significant roles. WP:TOOSOON. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:44, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Provost currently fails WP:ENT. To meet the notability guidelines there, an actor must have "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." While his role in Insatiable seems to qualify (as his character is mentioned in most of the episode summaries), his work in the other productions does not. The role in Realityhigh does not seem to be a starring role, as none of the sources I've checked mention it. (Our article is rather skimpy.) His role in Chance does not merit mention in the article, despite listing 10 main roles and 6 recurring roles. His role in The Case for Christ doesn't even merit mention on the film's official website. - SummerPhDv2.0 15:32, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Definitely fails the WP:GNG and the WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC 21:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.