Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pagnotta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Pagnotta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant coverage in multiple sources. Article largely written by SPA an dseems to consist almost entirely of original research. Coretheapple (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (people). -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that coverage I was able to locate doesn't seem to meet the GNG standard. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find reliable sources sufficiently addressing this article's subject. Champaign Supernova (talk) 16:15, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLP appears to be successful, but not rising to the level of historical significance.CorporateM (Talk) 16:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete per above - Fails GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a search shows there appear to be a number of Michael Pagnottas, including one involved in the construction industry, and one who has an appointment at London South Bank University. However, neither of those are this one. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.