Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Onyemaobi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 00:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Onyemaobi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:YOUTHATH. There were some external references about him I found, but they didn't help clear up notability concerns. Perhaps a TOOSOON situation. South Nashua (talk) 16:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as of this time, not notable. Lepricavark (talk) 17:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Autobiographical article with no supported indication of meeting inclusion guidelines. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Autobiographical article with no significant independent support. Appears to be an incoming freshman at TCU. No evidence that he meets any notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has not yet begun collegiate playing career and therefore governed by WP:NHSPHSATH. Not finding the "substantial and prolonged coverage" required by the guideline. This may change as his collegiate career progresses such that WP:NotJustYet may also apply. The article has no substantive content in any event, so no harm if it needs to be recreated later. Cbl62 (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:54, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.