Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Noack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails basic notability - some refs are even those that one adds one's self to and thus fully unreliable (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Noack[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD previously removed. Fails WP:GNG. Of the eight sources listed, 2 are "Who's Who"-style business directories, 3 are passing notes "CFO: Michael Noack" in business documents, 2 do not even mention the subject, and 1 is Wikipedia (!). Frickeg (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Frickeg (talk) 07:05, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than plenty of mentions of the fact that he's the CFO of Australian Vintage, the only source I could find was this short profile at Businessweek and that's not enough for WP:GNG. Dricherby (talk) 09:19, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing notable done instead of being CEO of a company who doesn't have article on wikipedia. Other thing only generate importance, but no notability. →TSU ^tp* 16:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.