Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Murphy (academic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Murphy (academic)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no working references that relate to the subject Rathfelder (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I could argue that working references aren't a requirement but I won't. I have expanded the article and added a number of additional (working) references. Hopefully this is satisfactory and the proposed deletion can be closed. Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 23:43, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. [1]. Nominator is advised to carry out WP:Before before making further nominations in this area. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:18, 29 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable. Nomination deals only with article quality. --Michig (talk) 08:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy to withdraw. He clearly is notable. But I think its important to defend the BLP principles. Rathfelder (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.