Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael Moore Is a Big Fat Stupid White Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not seems to meet WP:BK notability guidelines and entry contains no information apart of ISBN (despite it having been created some years ago). Tazmaniacs (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I think it does meet WP:BK. There are lots of reviews out there, including several from outside the US. The book was also a best-seller. Zagalejo^^^ 23:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notability established through reviews and best seller status. 23skidoo (talk) 05:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a stub and so just needs fattening. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep While article needs improvement, clearly notable from being a NYT best-seller and ample references appear to be available. Edward321 (talk) 14:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep as a notable work of criticism. Eddie.willers (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The actual book is terrible (that was an irrelevant editorial comment), but it has gone through 7 editions and is owned by over 1,000 libraries according to Open WorldCat. --Quartermaster (talk) 20:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: It got reviewed and was a best seller. Schuym1 (talk) 22:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep a NYT best seller should be an article that is expanded, not deleted. Alansohn (talk) 05:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.