Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael McDunn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ~ trialsanderrors (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael McDunn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Nominating for deletion per lack of notability. While this article is referenced, the subject still fails to meet WP:NOTE as he has not been the subject of any non trivial articles in any reliable sources. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Subject fails to meet BIO. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ≈Alessandro ♫ T • C 07:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, doesn't look to be worth a biography.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 11:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete --A. B. (talk) 02:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per RJD. Twenty Years 15:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.