Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Ley
Appearance
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 May 13. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to DBLP. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Michael Ley[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Michael Ley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. Clearly a minor academic but sources are very weak. None convey notability . Even the award is way below any notability level. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 13:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 13:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 13:32, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF or WP:GNG. According to [1], he is one of five research assistants working under a professor. --Tataral (talk) 09:53, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to DBLP. Already mentioned there and no independent notability is apparent. According to his Google Scholar profile (ignoring the top-cited publication that appears not to be by him) all of his top-cited works are about DBLP. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:47, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.