Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael L. Baird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Michael L. Baird[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, whose claim to fame seems to have been an expert witness in some celebrity trials. That's not good enough for a BLP, and a search for sources doesn't reveal much that's obviously connected to this Michael L. Baird. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:30, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete per the speedy nomination. Thanks for nominating in the same edit that you declined the speedy, Richie333. This should not be in mainspace Jytdog (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't look like he has significant reliable source coverage to meet WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:02, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. FitIndia talk to me 07:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to also fail WP:ONEEVENT, since he's only notable for the Dannielynn Stern case and not for academia (or, technically, being a "media consultant" for NBC w/ OJ). Perhaps redirect to Dannielynn Stern if somebody ever wanted to look him up on here, but I don't think that's warranted. --John M Wolfson (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability failing on all counts.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Source added, mostly mentioned in regards to the Dannielynn Birkhead paternity case, but fails BASIC/GNG. Sam Sailor 17:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.