Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael K. Faught

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 20:57, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael K. Faught

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is the CV of Dr Faught. The article looks to have been written by Dr Faught and is as such self-promotion and primarily self-serving. Moglucy (talk) 12:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is either blatant self-promotion or blatant WP:OR. The cites are all to his own cv, or his published papers, which essentially represents the primary record here (hence the OR). There is no evidence that the subject has received any independent coverage. Agricolae (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To add to my similarly-named colleague's findings, WoS shows h-index = 3, very much below our conventional threshold. Agricola44 (talk) 21:04, 6 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.