Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Herlache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The lack of coverage by independent reliable sources has not been addressed. J04n(talk page) 17:39, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Herlache

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced biography with unsubstantiated claims about a seemingly non-notable person. After checking four archives, the only sources that I found were one press release and several newspaper mentions that he was on some honor rolls. The sources in the article are one press release and two publications that the himself subject wrote. - Mr X 21:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The individual has just recieved Political Asylum having come from the US, in Brazil and Peru. This is what is called history. He has just authored two of the most important texts that have been written as it related to natural science and natural morality. He also owns a private equity fund that is raising $2.5 bn for infrastructure and economic development in the developing world. This individual is already one of the most influential people on the planet that you are just now hearing about and will in fact be the most influential individual period, in a relatively short period of time. I suggest you do your research more thoroughly here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.13.138.140 (talk) 21:34, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — 201.13.138.140 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete Other than a press release, no indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Safiel (talk) 22:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable autobiography with piss-poor sourcing, and no better sources found after a cursory search. His "influential texts" are self-published e-books. Hairhorn (talk) 15:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.98.138.250 (talk) 23:46, 28 February 2013 (UTC) — 38.98.138.250 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.