Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael F. Rogers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 00:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael F. Rogers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable minor league baseball player. Fails notability requirement per WP:Baseball. Millbrooky (talk) 21:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Batted .214 in rookie ball in 1987, then disappeared. Notability apparently based on a college home run record, but the Texas Rangers only made him a 20th-round draft pick so apparently hitting 45 home runs in 4 years of Missouri U baseball isn't overwhelming (it didn't even get him into the college's sports hall of fame). Name barely appears in any of the reliable sources referenced. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The only WP:Verifiable information about Rogers is that he played a season of Single-A baseball and he once held his university's home run record (mentioned in passing). Everything else is either unverifiable or about the achievements of people around him. • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable one year minor league career, college and high school achievements really do not address why this person should have a page. Hardnfast (talk) 11:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.