Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Cichy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Cichy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to WP:NHOCKEY. The Polish league isn't considered for any criteria and though he plays for Poland internationally, he has never played in a World Championship or an Olympics (he played in an Olympics qualifier but that doesn't count as Olympics participation). He was a first team All-Star in the USHL but crucially the league is not listed among the leagues in criteria #3. The Canadian junior leagues (OHL, WHL, QMJHL) are counted but the American junior leagues (USHL, NAHL) aren't. Therefore he fails #3. He also doesn't have any preeminent college awards to pass #4. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Tay87 (talk) 09:56, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet the sport-specific criteria and coverage is not significant enough to warrant GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable hockey plaeyr.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.