Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Brady (baseball)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is to delete as not meeting the notability criteria. As Alex did not elaborate further, IAR is insufficient to override the notability criteria in this case. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Brady (baseball)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:GNG or WP:BASEBALL. John from Idegon (talk) 22:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable per WP:IGNOREALLRULES, this article has true research value in a non-esoteric topic (baseball). Alex (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate? Rlendog (talk) 14:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per John from Idegon.--Yankees10 23:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not seeing anything notable here. Willing to reconsider pending Alex's response to my query about his "true research value." While I agree with Alex on the George Nell discussion, I don't see anything particularly compelling here. Not everyone who ever played minor league baseball is notable. Rlendog (talk) 15:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Player was involved in a trade involving several notable major leaguers. Does this make him notable himself? I'm not sure. But that could be what Alex was talking about. Withholding vote until he says something. Smartyllama (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.