Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Balk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pigman☿ 05:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Balk[edit]

I can't see any real claim to notability here, like an actual role in a TV show Grahame (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, there seems to be an extensive number of theatre appearances, which may convey notability. Maybe someone more familiar with that branch of performing arts can tell us if any of these productions are significant? Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete A long list of well known plays and musicals doesn't convey notability - many of these are commonly produced at amateur or semi-amateur level. The references to entertainment industry sites such as Imdb are pretty threadbare, citing just Blue Water High. Notability not established in my view. Murtoa (talk) 12:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Murtoa makes a good point - there's no evidence his performance of The Witches of Eastwick (etc.) was anything more than amateur. I'm not seeing anything on his IMDB bio. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.