Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael A. Joyce (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael A. Joyce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Although previously kept I think our current standards in WP:POLITICIAN would indicate that this is a non-notable local politician. There is not significant press coverage. Tassedethe (talk) 20:49, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails the general notability guideline.. --Anthem 21:45, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:POLITICIAN. His only claim to fame is as a past member of the town council of a medium-sized town. Google News Archive finds a fair amount about the Michael A. Joyce who is an election commissioner in Boston, but only a couple of passing mentions about this guy. --MelanieN (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a local politician who is not subject of substantive coverage in reliable sources. Hekerui (talk) 14:27, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.