Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find anything other than passing mentions or promotional material on this entity. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Entirely promotional and unsourced, little more than a condensed About page. Searches for sources bring about nothing significant. Article creator was previously acting on the account User:Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority, but was renamed to User:GrisetteMB18. The current Executive Director of the MBVCA is one Grisette Roque. The article has already been deleted twice under G11, and Draft:Miami Beach Visitor and Convention Authority was deleted under G11 a month ago. Sam Sailor 16:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sam Sailor: Woof. I definitely didn't look that deep when nominating. In light of that I've reported the page creator to WP:AIV for a promotional-only account block. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 16:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. Repeated violation of policy against promotion on Wikipedia (WP:NOTPROMO), and repeated efforts to recreate are a waste of valuable editor and administrator time. Bakazaka (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPROMO and WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 19:06, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NOTPROMO. This should only be re-created if it's completely neutral and from someone uninvolved with the VCA in any way shape or form. But I doubt with its history we can get there by any means. Nate • (chatter) 20:57, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPROMO and SALT to prevent recreation....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt. Repeated spam by blocked COI. Cabayi (talk) 22:50, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.