Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Morgan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mia Morgan[edit]
- Mia Morgan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Celebrity stylist. Questionable notability per WP:BIO. The sources in the article are mostly linked to her own website (and insofar as they purport to be copies of third-party coverage, the links don't work). Google News finds only a few passing mentions. Sandstein 06:40, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:28, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:33, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Seems to fail using WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENT and WP:Artist. "Celebrity stylist" is far from a precise term, anyone can claim to be one. A passing reference in NY Daily News is the closest thing to coverage here. Claims about "top 50 stylist" from WWD is associated with a broken link to the subject's own website and searching WWD.com shows no references to Mia Morgan. PantsB (talk) 18:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.