Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metropolitan Gazette (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolitan Gazette[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CS and WP:RS. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: unless otherwise proven, the article must be deleted as it has been lying around for more than a decade without sources (no source notice since 2007). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can verify it exists as my search show links to various Philippine directories but I don't think it is notable enough to warrant an article. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:19, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as I have been unable to find notable coverage. If someone else is for familiar with the topic and able to find something, it could be resurrected. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 01:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cant see any sense in preserving it. TolWol56 (talk) 00:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.