Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metrogenious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metrogenious

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NEO created by the author; WP:OR. I42 (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Wow, not only is it a useless neologism, but it's a misspelled useless neologism. That's impressive. Presumably he coined the word by analogy with "heterogeneous" and "homogeneous", but, well, then it would be "metrogeneous", not "metrogenious". Not that that really matters, since even if it were spelled correctly this would still fail WP:NEO, but anyway... —Smeazel (talk) 00:41, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NEO, again, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 09:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is there a term for which this would be a reasonable redirect? Otherwise, delete. UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 14:59, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt A user space version should through DRV before this is recreated at any spelling. Miami33139 (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.