Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metroad 5 (Sydney)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to M5 South Western Motorway. A case of duplication. The edit history of the page is retained for those who wish to selectively merge content not already discussed at the destination page. (non-admin closure) v/r, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metroad 5 (Sydney)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article M5 South Western Motorway, which is majority of Metroad 5, has history and other information about Metroad 5 (Sydney) Marcnut1996 (talk) 07:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you meant to start a merge discussion? --Rs chen 7754 08:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nope. The M5 motorway article already contains ALL the information that is found here. Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- Nbound (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect -- 124.168.177.19 (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - I don't see a reason to delete the edit history of the page. --Rs chen 7754 09:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Rschen7754. Even though the article is redundant, we should preserve the edit history. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Initially delete, now redirect per Rschen7754. Basically everyone wants redirect, because it is the same now as M5 South Western Motorway. Marcnut1996 (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To others who want to discuss, see WP:GD#Recommendations and outcomes to determine which is the word you want to put down, then add reasons. Marcnut1996 (talk) 12:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, a brief mention of the bits of Metroad 5 that are not part of the M5 is probably warranted on M5 South Western Motorway, but that's about it. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 13:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.