Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metric Arts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Metric Arts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims of notability are unsourced (+ I am unable to find anything that would back them up) and article serves as little more than a business listing. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:19, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clear advertised campaigning considering it's been deleted before, and this is still nothing but advertising again, so WP:NOT applies. SwisterTwister talk 23:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:SPA article originating from February 2013, in which month a similarly-named article was deleted from the Spanish Wikipedia as promotional. My searches are finding nothing to indicate more than a firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:30, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.