Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meteorbs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meteorbs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no reliable third person sources and lacks notability Dwanyewest (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Dwanyewest (talk · contribs) blanked the AfD discussion page after a malformed nomination which I fixed. I will leave him/her a note shortly requesting that he/she explicitly state if his/her intent was to withdraw the nomination. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dwanyewest left me a message on my talk page ([1]) indicating that the nomination was malformed and his intent was not to withdraw. Proceed as normal. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 01:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete alreadsy for lack of sources. Obviously nobody cares, as it's been relisted twice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.