Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Gear Solid: Acquiescence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Metal Gear Solid: Acquiescence[edit]
- Metal Gear Solid: Acquiescence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is about a short film based on Metal Gear Solid. The film has received 10 votes at IMDb. The website indicates that there is no agreement for theatrical distribution, and there has been no critical response to the film that I can find in Google. There seems to be no way to conclude this is a notable film per WP:NOTFILM. Tim Pierce (talk) 13:56, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable film. "Independent" appears to mean "fanmade" in this case, as described on the film's home page. Doesn't seem any more noteworthy than a YouTube production. Subject is unlikely to be able to carry its own article, though perhaps a short mention could be made in one of the MGS articles. Ham Pastrami (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - an independent film based on a major license is big red-flag. Whilst it played at DragonCon, it's not going to pass the notability guidelines unless the press have given it significant coverage. Marasmusine (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Jeremjay24 21:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.