Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metafunction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Babajobu 15:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
already on wikictionary: delete. Melaen 19:40, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- weak delete, though only because the article is nonsense (based on my understanding of what a metafunction is; perhaps there are several ways it is used). Having an article in Wiktionary is not a criterion for deletion; as many good articles start with dictionary definitions. Brighterorange 20:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pre-existing dicdef. Ruby 22:15, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Latinus 23:47, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.