Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metabolic age

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 01:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metabolic age[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is a stub, and seems non-notable. Little references available on google scholar. Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 02:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 02:52, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes WP:GNG based on significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]

References

^ Anderson C, Sloan A, Dupree L, Walker B (June 2019). "Younger Relative Metabolic Age Is Associated with a More Favorable Body Composition and Plant-based Dietary Pattern (P21-038-19)". Curr Devel Nutr. Jun (3(Suppl 1)). doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz041.P21-038-19.
^ Majzoub, A.; Talib, R.A.; Canguven, O.; Elbardisi, H.; Arafa, M.M.; Khalafalla, K.; Alsaid, S.S. (2017). "Metabolic age versus chronologic age effect on the gonadal state". Fertility and Sterility. 108 (3): e46–e47.
^ Kevin O'Sullivan (7 February 2019). "Q&A: Everything you need to know about your metabolic age". The Irish Times. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
^ Paolisso, G.; Barbieri, M.; Bonafe, M.; Franceschi, C. (2000). "Metabolic age modelling: the lesson from centenarians". European journal of clinical investigation. 30 (10). Wiley: 888–894.

SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SailingInABathTub. Clearly a notable topic. SpinningSpark 11:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am a little confused by the proposer's comment. I have given it a google scholar search of my own and it turns up almost 1,500 articles, the first 3 pages of which seem to contain articles that are related to the topic that this wikipedia page describes. It is clear that it is a phrase with multiple meanings, however. If Rockstone could explain what they meant I would be grateful. NeverRainsButPours (talk) 17:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I checked the article's sources before looking at the above votes, and similarly came to the conclusion that it passes the GNG. I am glad to see that others agree. Toadspike (talk) 00:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - having reconsidered this, and spending more time looking on Google Scholar, it appears I was wrong. Yes, this is notable. Please close this AFD as keep (or I can). -- Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 01:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[Anderson2019-1] Anderson C, Sloan A, Dupree L, Walker B (June 2019). "Younger Relative Metabolic Age Is Associated with a More Favorable Body Composition and Plant-based Dietary Pattern (P21-038-19)". Curr Devel Nutr. Jun (3(Suppl 1)). doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz041.P21-038-19.

[2] Majzoub, A.; Talib, R.A.; Canguven, O.; Elbardisi, H.; Arafa, M.M.; Khalafalla, K.; Alsaid, S.S. (2017). "Metabolic age versus chronologic age effect on the gonadal state". Fertility and Sterility. 108 (3): e46–e47.

[3] Kevin O'Sullivan (7 February 2019). "Q&A: Everything you need to know about your metabolic age". The Irish Times. Retrieved 20 May 2022.

[4] Paolisso, G.; Barbieri, M.; Bonafe, M.; Franceschi, C. (2000). "Metabolic age modelling: the lesson from centenarians". European journal of clinical investigation. 30 (10). Wiley: 888–894.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]