Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetaProp NYC

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 18:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MetaProp NYC[edit]

MetaProp NYC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think the company meets WP:GNG, or WP:CORP. I found one possibly reliable source that qualifies, here. Everything else I found is in passing or a blurb about an announcement by the company, or someone from the company talking about the company himself. Largoplazo (talk) 21:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 04:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TOOSOON, which is shown by paucity of sources. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The author noted on the article's Talk page that he has added more sources to the article that may help. Largoplazo (talk) 18:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as too soon, not convincing yet. SwisterTwister talk 04:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.