Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mess with MSN Messenger (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Malinaccier (talk) 20:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mess with MSN Messenger[edit]

This article was tagged for speedy deletion. Considering that there has been an AfD a couple years back which was closed as "no consensus", I found in unsuitable for speedy deletion. However, doing a little bit of research on the subject and looking over that AfD, I have decided to relist it. I feel that the closing admin's decision on the previous AfD was a poor one, The only closing "keeps" did not do anything to demonstrate notability but only referred to it as a "popular website." As it appears to me, the site fails WP:N and WP:WEB. Trusilver 04:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-How does this article fail Notability? I'm leaning towards delete, I just need further clarification from nom. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}§ 04:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Despite a reasonably good number of ghits, there is a remarkable lack of independent sources. It is prominently mentioned quite frequently among message boards and blogs, but that alone does not fulfill notability requirements. I feel that a blurb on the MSN Messenger article might be in order, but that's all. Trusilver 05:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm convinced. Delete-ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}§ 05:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom 100%. Also consider the changes since last AfD. This article is going nowhere. Potatoswatter (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no attribution of notability to independent sources. --Dhartung | Talk 08:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please Delete Ijanderson977 (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per previous comments. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.