Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesogog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 05:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mesogog

This character does not establish notability independent of Power Rangers: Dino Thunder through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 22:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Jay32183 (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge There are third party references. It is impossible to describe a fictional character without some form of plot details (not all of it is unnecessary) and merging would not require notability independent from the show. Even if all else fails, a simple redirect would be more appropriate than deletion.- Mgm|^(talk) 09:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability established. Just cruft. Eusebeus (talk) 23:35, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to existence of third party sources that demonstrate notability, but have been added since nomination and because "cruft" is never a valid reason for deletion. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 00:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be okay in regard to references; cruft is a matter of opinion, not a statement of fact. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Villains in Power Rangers: Dino Thunder. The character may be notable, but there is not enough content on the page to have an article on Mesogog. This is why I say merge. —Mythdon (talk • contribs) 19:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.