Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mesa Power LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mesa Power LP[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant English-language coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. PROD declined with a merge suggestion by User:DGG, but first, this is mostly unreferenced, and second, merge where? To Pickens Plan? Pampa Wind Project? T. Boone Pickens? I thought about boldly redirecting this but the text is a mess and I can't even decide which, if any, of those is a good target. Thoughts? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:09, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge anyy of the three would be good targets, but I suggest more specificallyT. Boone Pickens#Alternative energy.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:NCORP the 2 sources are deadlinks and a before search turns just this from 2012 that is just routine coverage. --Dom from Paris (talk) 08:56, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. I don't see anything worthwhile to merge either, a mention-in-passing, at most, is all that is required in related topics. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:22, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.