The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (nomination withdrawn). howcheng {chat} 00:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
merge with Conker's Bad Fur Day - not notable enough to be a standalone article NJ 19:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is Articles for deletion. Article merger does not involve deletion at any stage. Uncle G 20:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge has been suggested, sorry for the confusion NJ 22:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as the author's intention was for a merde. Stifle 13:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
