Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men in Black III-D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Men in Black II. Black Kite (t) (c) 13:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Men in Black III-D[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. Explicitly fails WP:NFF ("Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles")-- principal photography hasn't commenced, and by the article author's admission, "there's no plot yet." ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 05:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Men in Black II?. Seems to be partial a copy paste of what's already there. I imagine there's some coverage for this, but enough to support an article? I'd normally suggest a merge to the series article, which is.. in need of improvement, it's little more than a list which the navbox does a better job of. Rehevkor ✉ 14:57, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Merging any content not already present in MIB2's sequel section is of course fine with me. My only issue is with having a full article devoted to this, given its WP:NFF violation. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 20:12, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge back to Men in Black II. Fails WP:NFF. --FuriousFreddy (talk) 16:31, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.