Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melvin George (Mel)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Melvin George (Mel)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NBIO. – Ploni (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and India. Ploni (talk) 22:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mostly puffery with blatant COI editing, no indication of notability. — kashmīrī ^TALK 22:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a refbombed article on a non-notable engineer, inventor and businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional. எ (talk) 15:17, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 1.Multiple sites use the same title and content, those sites should be promotional sites or content farms and should not be used. At least most of the site's content are copy-pasted.(product.nanjixiong.com / veewell.com / hinyeung.com / dyfocus.com / cxsw3d.com / bbs.fcc.qinggl.com / xuandouwan.com / 360kuai.com / sohu.com / yidianzixun.com / qq.com / kknews.cc / zhihu.com) 2.Many sources use user generated sites like forum(bbs.fcc.qinggl.com) / facebook.com / youtube.com / twitter.com / instagram.com.--Rastinition (talk) 22:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.