Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melrose Bickerstaff (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Melrose Bickerstaff

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Michigan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:09, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article is an absolute mess of primary sources, unreliable sources and passing mentions, and a search brought up nothing better. Clear WP:GNG failure. Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Devonian Wombat lacks indepth sources fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. We have tended to keep the winner, place, and show of major reality shows. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: she didn't win though, she was the runner-up. Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your link doesn't talk about winners of reality shows. But see WP:TOP4 which says that who wins is not the issue. BruceThomson (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you, BruceThomson, for pointing out the change in policy to TOP4. Striking my prior comments. Bearian (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.