Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melodye Prentiss
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1968. Clear consensus for redirect per standard procedure/past AfD results and all votes, snow closure. The Bushranger One ping only 09:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Melodye Prentiss[edit]
- Melodye Prentiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources found, non notable Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1968 per precedent, consensus being that appearing as a centerfold is not of itself sufficient to support a standalone article. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 06:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Personally, I would like to Keep article like this, but based on prevailing sentiment, this is the type of article that we should Redirect.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect fails GNG and WP:PORNBIO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasttimes68 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. While I gave this one a pass when I performed my first round of redirects, the community consensus in the later group of Playmate AFDs took a slightly more stringent line. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.