Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Palmer (doctor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 10:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Palmer (doctor)

delete, spamlike would need complete rewrite to meet standards Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Copyvio of http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/A2E1HHD295JYWA among others, tagged as such. --CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 03:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy Delete~~ - WP:COPYVIO - http://www.liverdisease.com/palmertwo.html — X S G 05:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Per the site from which most of the content comes: "This website, and all its contents, are copyright 1994-2009 by Melissa Palmer, M.D. All Rights Reserved." Wikipedia does not have the right to use this content. — X S G 05:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Per WP:COPYVIO, I've reverted the page to the most recent version which didn't contain the COPYVIO. AfD should proceed normally. — X S G 06:08, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ - No reliable sources found to verify notability. — X S G 06:09, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think she's notable. I'm withdrawing my vote, and I'm going to take some time to expand her article some, noting sources. She's clearly got a conflict of interest going on, but I think this article can be saved. — X S G 06:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I've looked high and low to substantiate some of the claims made, to no avail. — X S G 09:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam bio of non-notable person being used as promotion. Drawn Some (talk) 23:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline. GS gives h = 9, top cites 106, 48,42,33... Xxanthippe (talk) 05:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.