Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Ann Young

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melissa Ann Young[edit]

Melissa Ann Young (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Young's only almost claim to fame is winning Miss Wisconsin USA, but winning a state Miss USA pageant is not enough by itself to make someone notable. Beyond this the article has been tagged since 2009 as not having adequate sources. That an article can go so long with no attention to such details suggests that the subject is not in fact notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss Wisconsin USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 17:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project. No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course. NewYorkActuary (talk) 04:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think it meets WP:Anybio. Dolotta (talk) 23:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.