Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne feminist collective

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne feminist collective[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CLUB. No supporting sources LordVetinari (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as group with no notability presented, which isn't too surprising for a brand-new local club. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wanted to speedy it but was reluctant to do so as I suspected others may contest it. There may be a verifiable claim of notability that I, not living in Melbourne, don't know about. LordVetinari (talk) 01:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. New organisation and a Google search doesn't indicate that it's notable. Nick-D (talk) 10:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.