Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne digital television technical parameters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne digital television technical parameters[edit]

This seems like WP:NOT material for some reason...but I'm not sure. ViperSnake151 21:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~. Looks like WP:NOTDIR, possibly WP:INDISCRIMINATE, ~~but no judgment yet~~. • Gene93k (talk) 21:43, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOT#GUIDE. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:NOTDIR and WP:INDISCRIMINATE apply. - Mgm|^(talk) 23:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm not sure what specific parts of WP:NOTDIR and WP:INDISCRIMINATE apply (Please specify). An analogy of this article is the periodic table. BUT I am happy to be out-voted as the article shows little interest anyhow. —Preceding unsigned comment added by E! (talk • contribs) 03:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOT#GUIDE Michellecrisp (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:NOTHOWTO. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.