Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Tramcar Preservation Association

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Black Kite (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Tramcar Preservation Association[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Melbourne Tramcar Preservation Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references. Send back to draft? Fuddle (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Fuddle (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify - happy to give this one another chance with some improvement by sending back to draft. I suspect there are enough sources to justify notability but the article doesn't contain enough content to make a good decision on this yet. Deus et lex (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete. Copyvio. [1]. The remaining listcruft simply does not belong here. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as copyvio per above. Will tag as such now. Nightfury 08:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I've declined the G12 nomination, as not all text was affected (and of course I've also removed the copyvio); the list-type material that remains was probably copied from somewhere, but has no creative content and so is not covered by copyright. Since I'm here, I'll add a comment: there's no point draftifying this unless there are demonstrably enough WP:RS for it to pass WP:NCORP. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draft/userfy I see some possible sources to establish notability per WP:ORG, but cannot work on this right now. If judged too thin for draftspace per @Justlettersandnumbers: please put it in my userspace, or I'll do so after deletion. Thanks StarM 01:19, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Melbourne_Tramcar_Preservation_Association&oldid=963915052"