Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melaka Gallery (Malaysia)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. After five years in existence and a full cumulative month at AfD, the article has not been meaningfully expanded or improved, nor have any appropriate sources been identified or added. The Sin Chew story identified here only devotes one short paragraph to the subject: two sentences describing the structure (not the gallery, mind), and one lamenting the limited hours of operation. Lest this bare-bones page sit stagnant for years more with no attempts being made to establish notability, I feel deletion is the only appropriate result. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Melaka Gallery (Malaysia)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. Did a few searches in its Malay name but nothing indepth just directory listings. Previous AfD is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malacca Gallery (Malaysia) LibStar (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Useful Malaysian tourist attraction to include in Wikipedia, and I'd hate to see this go. Online searches also indicate this gallery should be notable. Ambrosiawater (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

where are the sources from your online search? WP:ITSUSEFUL. LibStar (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I believe it is mentioned in this sourceThe adaptation of creativity in museum sector: A case study of Malacca Maritime Museum, Malaysia, and anyone else searching for sources should try the alternative spelling, but the mention in the source is in passing as are other mentions. Found it mentioned in some books too, such as Lonely Planet, but existence is not notability, and none of the sources show why this is notable. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are Chinese sources like these[1] which has covered it.KartikeyaS343 (talk) 09:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.