Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mekorama (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. Sufficient sources were shown to exist in the discussion to pass WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mekorama (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One "honorable mention" award; insufficient in-depth cov in RS for GNG. Most refs are not independent. MB 14:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There seems to be indepth coverage in various WP:VG/RS and other reliable sources like Gamezebo [1], Touch Arcade [2], Times of India [3], Spiegel Online [4], it:Multiplayer.it (currently having a WP:VG/RS discussion but leaning to reliable) [5], de:GIGA [6], Bild [7], TechLife [8] with paragraph coverage in The Washington Post [9], Svet Kompjutera [10] and IGN India [11]. Passes WP:GNG easily. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Evidence this clearly passes the general notability guidelines has been found. Also if you click the Google news search at the top of the AFD, that helps you find some of these very easily. Please do that WP:BEFORE nominating an article for deletion. Dream Focus 04:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please search for five seconds to see if there are additional sources out there before nominating something for deletion. This game has pretty obviously gotten a decent amount of coverage. Bluedude588 (talk) 20:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - outside coverage is enough to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 04:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.