Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmood Hassan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers. Sandstein 19:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mehmood Hassan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and India. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep/Redirect to List of Madhya Pradesh cricketers It's my belief that somebody playing this number of fixtures, at the time he played them, will have GNG passing somewhere in either offline or non-English language sources. However, in a simple internet search I've only been able to find passing mentions, so therefore have gone weak keep. There is a suitable redirect here though, per WP:ATD, which can be used if it's a preferred option if nothing significant crops up. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:17, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or redirect) - I found no evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG. Please ping me if good sources are identified. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is probably going to need to be a redirect - we're going to lose an awful lot of articles on brown people at this rate btw, perhaps one for the diversity people at the WMF to consider. The List of MP cricketers is an obvious redirect target and there is a long standing consensus going back to at least 2018 that suggests we redirect when we really can't find sources about cricketers. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:40, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.