Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehdi Iskandarli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:52, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mehdi Iskandarli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG Seraphim System ^(talk) 14:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please point by point clarify why this article brake the rules of WP:GNG ? Best regards--Drdrmtlgst (talk) 13:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is enough here to satisfy WP:NPROF, let alone WP:GNG. Due to the special circumstances of academics, we have specific requirements that might allow academics to establish notability under WP:NPROF even if they do not meet WP:GNG. In this case, I don't think the scholarships will be enough. If you feel one of the criteria has been satisfied, please explain here. Seraphim System ^(talk) 23:04, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist ^talk|contribs 07:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I rarely relist articles more than twice but we have no votes at all here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability not yet sufficient WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Not enough sources to satisfy the WP:GNG and his work has not had enough impact to pass WP:PROF. – Joe (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.