Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Kane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Kane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability other than applying for something that over 200,000 others applied for and didn't get. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Every aspect of this, down to the description of her current job, is promotional, and the subject fails our notability guidelines by a Swedish mile. Drmies (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being an applicant/candidate is not inherently notable. Not enough coverage for WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:06, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.