Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megacomputer
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Megacomputer[edit]
- Megacomputer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear that the term "megacomputer" is being used by anyone except the single source(deadlinked), which happens to be the organization that created the "megacomputer". Fails GNG, NEO, sourcing policy, and the bulk of the article is a direct quote.
- Delete as nominator. / /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 05:18, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- note there is an unrelated use of the term for a theoretical computer that has the same relationship to a supercomputer that a supercomputer has to a mainframe, but I'm not sure that's used beyond one fictional universe. HominidMachinae (talk) 06:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article says that there has only been one megacomputer and it has its own article. This one is only a definition of the word. Info on the topic is already in the other article. Borock (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 16:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A quick look at the current DEISA web site as well as an archive of the page referenced: http://web.archive.org/web/20080307143429/http://www.deisa.org/grid/architecture.php show neither uses the word "megacomputer". So it seems just made up. W Nowicki (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Completely made up. Joe Chill (talk) 17:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.