Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MegaMek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MegaMek[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability outside of ScourgeForce popularity which has been regularly discussed on Talk. The game exists and is discussed on a fora, but no significant, in depth sourcing. Prior bulk AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boson (computer game) which was, essentially, procedural keep. StarM 15:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was unable to find anything that would count as a significant reliable secondary coverage. The Linux Magazine link cited in the article is just an interview [1]. Fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There are zero hits in WP:VG/SE and bare WP:PASSING mentions in the Internet Archive. IceWelder [✉] 09:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.