Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeting at the Tower

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting at the Tower[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NFILM criteria. ––FormalDude talk 02:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 02:22, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. ––FormalDude talk 02:37, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion. Why? The film is on imdb and elCinema — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masry684 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Masry684: None of those establish notability, as they are databases. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Two Citations are From Google books. Thanks

Comment@Masry684: in a film article it’s important to have a “reception” section outlining what critics said about the film. You’ve added lots of references and I haven’t looked at them all, but are there any critical reviews of the film that discuss it in depth? If the refs just mention that this film exists, then it probably isn’t notable. Mccapra (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks I didn’t know that we need critical articles for notability. But if the critical articles are negative will the film still be notable? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masry684 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Masry684: Yes, even if reviews are negative they'll still count towards WP:NFILM and WP:GNG Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the references seem to be significantly about this film. One of the JSTOR sources, for example, is a book review in Black Camera of a book that does not mention the film. The original author is advised to read the general and film notability guidelines more closely. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:30, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG and NFILM per Eggishorn.4meter4 (talk) 22:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.