Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meesam Zaidi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meesam Zaidi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy was declined, and prod removed by IP editor (possibly the author). No real indication of notability - as references, youtube and the text of a speech. While I feel that there is possible notability, I don't feel that the article as it stands shows it. I would be quite happy for a rescue to take place. Peridon (talk) 11:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No useful sources - therefore - it's rendered useless. And the Google search doesn't come up with anything considered reliable. Dokter Zombieman ^brains.../_{the infected} 12:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. 1 gnews hit does not cut it [1]. LibStar (talk) 00:31, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self-promotion. Hashemi1971 (talk) 07:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.