Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meena Harris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meena Harris[edit]

Meena Harris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real demonstration of notability. Doubtful notability. Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Edwardx (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Interesting aspects, like early Facebook employee, but none of these are passable claims of notability. Most of the reference list is ephemeral non-RS, or trivial mentions (like her name in the obituary of one of her relatives). Agricola44 (talk) 00:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • DeleteKeep Mentions in Business Insider, Newsweek, and what I can't tell if its a blog or not. Will look into Bustle. L3X1 (distænt write) 03:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Changed !vote after further examining of sources. L3X1 (distænt write) 15:50, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.